2117 stories
·
2 followers

On wintering.

1 Share
On wintering.

This newsletter is free to read, and it’ll stay that way. But if you want more - extra posts each month, no sponsored CTAs, access to the community, and a direct line to ask me things - paid subscriptions are $2.50/month. A lot of people have told me it’s worth it.

Upgrade

Abraham Lincoln rode home from Washington in December 1849, with what looked like the end of his career packed into his luggage. He'd served one term in the House, alienated his constituents by opposing the Mexican War, and lost his shot at a federal Land Office appointment.

He went back to Springfield to practice law, a near-broken man. And, for nearly 5 years, he barely participated in national politics.

He rode the Illinois circuit, argued patent disputes, and taught himself geometry from Euclid by candlelight in coach inns. He read newspapers obsessively; he read Shakespeare and the King James Bible until he could quote either from pretty much any starting point.

The folks who saw him in those years said he looked...tired.

When he returned to the spotlight, in October 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act had cracked the country open. Lincoln walked onto the stage at Peoria and spoke for 3 hours straight. The man who'd been a country lawyer that morning was a national figure by midnight.

Six years later, he was president.

Lincoln's lost years are the part of the biography American children skip past in school; they get the rail-splitter, the beard, the debates, the war, the emancipation, the address, the assassination.

But the 5 years we skip over are the whole ballgame.

They rebuilt the instrument.

The English writer Katherine May coined the modern usage in her 2020 book Wintering, but the idea is older than the word. Russian peasants called the long quiet stretches between harvests zima and treated them as a season for weaving, sleeping, repairing tools, and telling stories. Japanese Buddhist monasteries built whole liturgies around rohatsu sesshin, the seven-day winter retreat that closes the year. Foragers like the !Kung and the Hadza, spent something like 4 hours a day on subsistence and the rest on…rest.

Productivity is a recent invention; wintering is not.

Cormac McCarthy published Blood Meridian in 1985 to a shrugging response. The New York Times reviewed it in a single column. He'd been writing in El Paso for years, broke and largely forgotten. Friends thought he'd peaked. Then in 1992 All the Pretty Horses came out, won the National Book Award, sold half a million copies, and the back catalog got reissued. McCarthy hadn't been recovering. He'd been finishing something the culture wasn't ready for in 1985 and was ready for by 1992.

He'd been wintering.

Daniel Day-Lewis stopped acting in 1997 and apprenticed as a cobbler in Florence. He came back, played Bill the Butcher in Gangs of New York, and won an Oscar. He stopped again. Came back. Won another Oscar. Stopped again, and by all reports has actually stopped this time, though I wouldn't bet on it. The cobbler years were how he reset the instrument.

In the long winter, organisms route metabolism inward.

Trees pull resources out of leaves, drop the leaves, and push the sugars down into root systems. Bears don't sleep, exactly. Their core temperature drops a few degrees, their metabolism halves, and they cycle slowly through fat reserves while their kidneys learn to recycle urea into protein. They come out in spring with their bones still mineralized and their muscles roughly intact, which is something no human has yet figured out how to do. What the bear performs is one of the most metabolically sophisticated tricks in the animal kingdom.

The Romans understood that a field left fallow for a season produced more in the next cycle than one worked continuously. Norfolk farmers in the 18th century made it a four-course rotation: wheat, turnips, barley, clover, with the clover restoring nitrogen the wheat had pulled out. The land that looks unused is doing the most useful work.

People who winter well are doing something analogous. They route attention inward and downward, into the parts of the system that don't show up on the surface. They read, they revise, they take long walks they can't account for, and they think the same thought 400 times until it cracks.

Most of what gets published, shipped, posted, and announced is washed off the rocks within a quarter. The people doing it are running on a treadmill that resets their position to zero every Monday. They have to keep producing to stay visible, and visibility is how they earn the right to keep producing.

It's a closed loop, and it generates very little compound interest.

The winterer is off the loop. They aren't maintaining a position because they don't have a position to maintain.

In the short term, you pay dearly for it.

People forget you exist. Calls dry up. Old collaborators stop replying. Younger versions of you lap you in the standings.

The benefit is that you can do work that takes longer than a quarter, and longer than a year, and longer than 5 years, because nobody is auditing the line item.

Charles Darwin came back from the Beagle voyage in 1836 with the rough outline of natural selection in his head. He published On the Origin of Species in 1859. The intervening 23 years included long stretches when he wrote almost nothing in his theory notebooks, partly because he was sick, partly because he was writing 8 volumes about barnacles, and partly because he understood the case had to be airtight. When he finally published, the argument was so heavily fortified that the church spent the next 50 years trying to find a hairline crack and failing.

If Darwin had published in 1840, he might be a footnote. His 23 years of comparative silence were the moat.

Robert Caro started his Lyndon Johnson biography in 1976. He's published 4 volumes of an intended 5. He's now 90. He moved to the Texas Hill Country to live among the people Johnson grew up with, because he thought he couldn't write about a man without inhabiting his weather. Each volume took roughly a decade. The publishing world treats him as a slow eccentric. Anyone who's read the books knows he's running a different clock, on a different scale, and that no one currently working at speed is going to produce anything close.

Plenty of people stop and produce nothing. The graveyard of failed comebacks is large, and wintering is dangerous as a strategy because most attempts at it collapse into actual stagnation.

The difference between the two is invisible from the outside, until the end.

The reason the wintering few register as dangerous, when they re-emerge, is that they have something the still-busy don't have: a center of gravity. They've spent enough time alone with a single problem to develop actual opinions about it, opinions that don't move when other people push on them. In a culture optimized for constant repositioning, conviction is a structural advantage. The market doesn't know how to price it.

The winterer has been watching while you weren't looking. They've watched the consensus shift, watched the mistakes pile up. When they come back, they come back with reads you can't get from inside the swirl, because the swirl makes you stupid.

The philosopher Hannah Arendt, writing in The Life of the Mind in the 1970s, described thinking itself as a form of withdrawal. You can't think and act at the same time, she said, because thinking pulls you out of the stream of ongoing events. She was suspicious of people who claimed to do both at once.

The British psychiatrist Anthony Storr, in Solitude (1988), made the case that the most original work of major figures often came out of long isolated stretches. Newton in plague-year Cambridge. Wittgenstein in Norway. Kafka in Zürau. Beckett in his Paris apartment with the curtains drawn. Storr wasn't romanticizing it; the isolated stretches were often miserable, sometimes pathological. But the work that came out of them had a density that wasn't available to people doing it part-time.

Any culture that systematically punishes withdrawal is going to lose its most concentrated thinkers to either burnout or invisibility. The modern knowledge economy, with its ambient pressure to post, ship, and stay in the conversation, is a machine for producing exactly that loss. The people we'll wish we had in 15 years are, right now, being shamed into producing slop they don't believe in, because the alternative is to drop out, and dropping out reads as failure.

The winterers who survive this will be those who can tolerate looking like they failed. This is a real and rare psychological skill, and most people don't have it. It requires you to be okay with the wrong kind of silence around your name for years. It requires you to pass on small wins that would re-establish your position. It requires you to bet that what you're working on is worth more than what you're giving up, when the only person who can evaluate the bet is you, and you might be wrong, and you'll only know in 7 years.

Lincoln didn't know in 1851 that he was wintering.

He thought he was finished.

He told his law partner William Herndon that his political career was over, and he believed it. And then his country produced an emergency that demanded exactly the kind of mind he'd been nurturing, and he was the man of the hour whose hour had finally come.

The people who appear to have stopped, in any given year, are mostly people who have actually stopped. But small fraction of them are doing the other thing.

Our world produces emergencies on a reliable schedule; when the next one comes, watch who walks out of the woods.

SPONSORED

Westenberg is designed, built and funded by my agency, Studio Self. Reach out and work with me:

Work with me
Read the whole story
koranteng
7 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Temporary Conveniences

1 Share
Beholden to temporary conveniences
Like Darwin's notion of species
The seductive appeal of idées fixes
Coinages that supplant varieties

But labels, with their simplifying shorthand
Are but an instrument in the hands of a searcher
The tool should not be mistaken for reality
It is a confusion to fall prey to appearances

...

It may suit you to doubt my intentions
Out of concern for a supposed naivety
Discarding words and ascribing fictions
Still, the state of the world is not what you think

Admittedly, base motives drive the human animal
Urges that render us no different from beasts
Disguises abound, badges of the sensualists
But the plain truth is my love is forever


abutia mud hut

Temporary Conveniences, a playlist


Dwele lays down the soundtrack to this note. His live performances were the highlight of my years in the Bay Area, he always seemed to have something to prove in Oakland. Wit in the vein of funk. The poet laureate of modern soul. (spotify version) File under: , , , , , , , ,

Writing log: January 21, 2023

Read the whole story
koranteng
16 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Protection Racket

1 Share
Militias, in Africa as elsewhere, have long meant pain and suffering
Intimations of blood and sneering menace underlie their extortion
The through line from self defense units to neighborhood gangs
The stuff of protection rackets imposed by outright thugs
In Haiti and the Central African Republic currently,
In Sierra Leone and Liberia memorably,
In Congo perennially, militias are a blight

If the area boys were initially benign
Touts, they now traffic in grim violence
Bodies for hire, their labor is all too physical
Offers you can't refuse, resolution by any means necessary
In the background, rivalries and monetary interests
Underlying conditions that motivate these predators
Apt to cut you for a nothing, some violation, a perceived slight

The bulk of their ranks, per the analysts, are the lumpenproletariat
Ever changing boundaries, uniforms and unspoken codes of conduct
Territory fiercely protected, lines that the unwary shouldn't cross
Space, the world shrinks down to corners, claustrophobia
The menace of the long walk past them, the unbearable scrutiny
Grudging respect for their power, glad you made it safely home today
Cold comfort, for when in their grip, all that matters is might is right


pathos the closed ghana restaurant after uruguay won on penalties in the world cup sigh

Protection Racket, a playlist


A soundtrack for this note (spotify version)
[Update March 2024]

Ten months after writing the above, I note that Haiti is descending into paroxysms of gang violence. It strikes me that this note still has a couple of years to go before being published. I'd rather be wrong about what I write.

File under: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Writing log: January 21, 2023

Read the whole story
koranteng
4 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Alright

1 Share
Alright, there's a music to the voicing
Words tumbling out not quite deliberately
A mere good morning from her... Sigh
It lifts you out of melancholy
Togetherness, to dance to her conversation
No matter the topic, it feeds your soul
To hear her. Heaven on the ground
And that's alright with me

...

Alright, a faint thread runs through this thing
Marking moods, as it does, across the rich seams
Hard to understand, but I made my peace early on
Undulating rhythms, I confess, leave me confounded
Chalk it up to underlying conditions
And that's alright with me

...

Alright, the broken strings of your heart will eventually mend
It's a healing process and I fear we must be patient
As to commitment, I'm sated with the stolen moments - intense
Restlessness is your privilege
And that's alright with me.

...

Alright, a passing of the baton
The burden of responsibility
Amidst capricious fortune that we face
Navigating across uncertain terrain
Failure is not an option they say
And that's alright with me


No problem

Alright, a playlist


A soundtrack for this note (spotify version) File under: , , , , , ,

Writing log: January 18, 2023

Read the whole story
koranteng
11 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

On Being Fiscally Retrenched: Notes on Austerity and the Gig Economy

1 Share
On Being Fiscally Retrenched: Notes on Austerity and the Gig Economy

The language of economic policy is designed to obscure. Fiscal consolidation sounds responsible, even prudent. “Structural adjustment” suggests repair, improvement, optimization. “Widening the tax base” evokes democratic participation, a broadening of civic duty. These are the euphemisms that dress violence in the rhetoric of necessity.

I learned this first not from reading economic theory but from watching my bank account. In September 2022, when President Ruto took office, I was an undergraduate freelance content creator, one of thousands of young Kenyans who had found in the digital economy what some in our parents’ generation found in the informal sectors that bloomed in the ‘90s: a liveable, though precarious income, a sense of purpose, the possibility of a future. Within two years, that possibility has been systematically dismantled by a series of tax measures that transformed my modest earnings into a labyrinth of deductions, each one justified by prescriptions handed down by International Financial Institutions and donors.

In the early ‘90s, the government fired civil servants and called it restructuring. Thirty years later, the gig economy is similarly being dismantled through austerity measures in the name of widening the tax base. The mechanism differs, but the outcome is identical. Both times, an entire generation found the ground beneath them removed by policy, their livelihoods sacrificed at the altar of International Monetary Fund conditionalities.

The late African economist Professor Thandika Mkandawire once described the Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) imposed on Africa in the 1980s as the Great African Depression. Due to Kenya’s highly accruing debt, the IMF and the World Bank imposed SAPs as a condition for receiving further financial aid, forcing the country to adopt neoliberal policies by prioritizing export markets and drastically cutting social spending on public services.

The SAPs intended to create rapid and sustainable economic growth instead precipitated widespread unemployment as public-sector jobs were slashed. Those who fled to the burgeoning informal sector had to contend with its precarity and low wages, their plight exacerbated by the overnight collapse of social systems as essential services became inaccessible to many due to the removal of subsidies and increased user fees. Cost sharing became mandatory, resulting in higher dropout rates and reduced access to medical care, especially for the proletariat and rural populations.

Before the advent of SAPs, the state financed the entire university education, including providing students with a “boom” allowance for personal effects. The 1991 implementation of SAPs required undergraduates to pay KSh6,000 per year as part of a newly introduced, non-negotiable student loan scheme, signalling the end of the “boom” allowance. This policy change was met with fierce resistance, leading to student protests and the closure of Moi and Kenyatta Universities. It heralded the new era where now, decades later, students either fund themselves through campus, or bear the weight of student loans.

My father, who had finished secondary school a year earlier, had harboured dreams of higher education and social mobility, only to watch his dreams snuffed out: the cost-sharing policy proved too steep a cliff for my ailing grandfather to scale, given he had invested his retirement package in my aunts’ and uncles’ secondary school education. So my father did what the economy required of the young and ambitious; he improvised.

Arriving in Nairobi in ’92, my father found work in Industrial Area, among the plastic and chemical factories that line Enterprise Road. He initially intended it to be a detour on the way to something better. But the I990s had other designs. The same SAPs that had restructured university funding were simultaneously dismantling the formal sector he hoped to enter. Parastatals were privatized or dissolved. The civil service contracted. The stable jobs with pensions and predictable trajectories – the jobs that had built Kenya’s middle class in the Kenyatta years – were now artefacts of a previous economic era, like rotary phones.

The factory job became permanent in the way that temporary things do when there are no alternatives. Thirty years he has worked there since, breathing in plastic fumes, operating the same machines, watching younger men arrive with the same desperate optimism he had carried. Some saved enough for a boda boda, a small kiosk. Most didn’t. The private sector, structured on contracts predicated on fluctuating markets and thus prone to mass layoffs even then, seemed to offer no formal path forward, only lateral movement, only survival.

I think about this often now – the way history doesn’t merely repeat but rhymes, the way the children inherit the debts of their fathers, literally and metaphorically. When I entered university in 2020, I did so under the same cost sharing system that had excluded my father, although by then it had reformed, expanded, become slightly more accessible. I qualified for a loan. This felt, at the time, like progress.

The loan covered tuition and part of the upkeep but the upkeep is a euphemism that doesn’t account for the actual cost of existing in Nairobi – rent in the overcrowded neighbourhood near campus, food, transport and the textbooks that lecturers require but that the library doesn’t stock. The gap between what HELB (Higher Education Loans Board) provided and what survival required was wide enough to swallow ambition whole. So, I too, improvised.

The informal sector had evolved by the time my generation came along, had gone digital, had acquired new vocabularies of precarity. I wrote articles for content mills at three dollars per thousand words. I designed graphics on Fiverr. I transcribed audio files for Indian platforms that paid per task, not per hour, a distinction that proved significant once the tasks dried up, or the rates dropped. I learned to navigate Upwork, Mpesa, PayPal, the contemporary infrastructure of hustle. The gig economy became our refuge where we could still harbour dreams of social mobility in that digital frontier to which the government’s reach had not yet extended.

I graduated in 2024 with a degree and a debt that I’ll be repaying for years, probably a decade. The loan accumulates interest at rates that feel punitive given the job market I am entering – or rather, not entering – since the formal sector continues to contract, with AI automation and austerity combining to eliminate entry-level positions. But I had a laptop, an internet connection, and a PayPal account, and that seemed enough to suggest I could navigate this new phase of my life, this new frontier of “adulting”. The sense that if I worked hard enough, fast enough, I could make it work.

That was before they decided we needed to be taxed.

The IMF’s Extended Fund Facility (EFF) and Extended Credit Facility (ECF) arrangements, which were initiated to address debt vulnerabilities and the economic shocks following the global pandemic – US$2.34 billion over 38 months – arrived wrapped in the language of necessity and inevitability. With the facilities came the familiar prescriptions: Kenya must consolidate its fiscal position. Revenue must increase. Expenditure must decrease. These are not political choices but mathematical imperatives.

However, mathematics can be ideological. The decision to increase revenue through taxation rather than through repatriating stolen wealth, the choice to decrease expenditure by cutting subsidies rather than by reducing corruption, these are political acts disguised as technical ones. When fuel subsidies were removed and VAT on fuel doubled, the cost was not borne equally. The wealthy absorbed the increase. The poor and the precariously employed – which is to say most of us – saw our margins of survival narrow to slivers.

Let me be clear: I’m not opposed to taxation in principle. I understand that governments need revenue, that we all have obligations to the collective. What I oppose is the particular arithmetic of this taxation, the way it’s been calculated to extract maximum revenue from minimal resistance. We’re easy targets, we freelancers and gig workers. We don’t have unions or lobbying groups or parliamentary representation. We’re scattered, atomized, connected only by WhatsApp groups where we share screenshots of unpaid invoices and commiserate about client ghosting. We exist in a legal grey zone where employment law doesn’t quite apply, and tax law applies too much.

The Significant Economic Presence Tax was the first blow. Three per cent doesn’t sound like much until you realize it’s three per cent on top of everything else, three per cent that foreign platforms are now obligated to withhold before they pay you, three per cent that assumes you’re earning enough for three per cent to be negligible. For someone making $500 a month – which is a good month, an excellent month, a month where everything went right – that’s $15 gone immediately. In a country where $15 can be transport for a week or data bundles for a month, or the difference between eating and not eating enough, 3 per cent is not negligible.

Then came the Digital Content Monetization Tax, which is perhaps the most elegantly cruel piece of fiscal policy I’ve encountered. It targets the dream itself – the possibility that your YouTube channel or Instagram account, or TikTok videos might generate income. Never mind that for every influencer making millions, there are ten thousand making minimal dividends to nothing at all, posting into the void, hoping. The state has looked at this landscape of hustle and aspiration and decided it needs a cut.

Five to twenty per cent, depending on your earnings bracket, which means the more successful you are at this precarious endeavour, the more you’re punished for succeeding. It’s a tax on hope, essentially. A tax on the idea that you might, through creativity and sheer force of will, build something that sustains you.

And then there’s SHIF. The Social Health Insurance Fund, uncapped, ambitious in its vision of universal healthcare and devastating in its execution. In theory, it’s beautiful; everyone contributes, everyone benefits, healthcare for all. In practice, it’s another deduction from an already decimated income. For salaried employees, it’s manageable – deducted automatically, matched by employers, spread across monthly earnings, although there have been reports of subpar performance. For us in the gig economy, it’s chaos. How do you calculate contributions on irregular income? What do you do in the months when there’s no income at all?

Terry could tell you more about SHIF than I can. I met her last December in Bungoma through a friend of a friend’s sister. Terry runs a small business, importing goods – clothes, shoes, accessories – from Uganda through the Malaba border to sell in the local Bungoma town market, Chepkube. She has managed to raise her three children mostly on her own, and recently she was blessed with an infant daughter. She’s exactly the kind of informal entrepreneur the government claims to support with its hustle fund rhetoric, its NYOTA loans, and its promises of bottom-up economics.

When her daughter developed a fever that wouldn’t break, Terry took her to the local dispensary. They referred her to the district hospital – the fever was high, the baby was listless, it needed further investigation. At the hospital, they asked for her SHIF number. She gave it. They asked for her employment details. She explained; informal sector, self-employed, irregular income. They told her she SHIF did not work for non-civil servants seeking outpatient services – she needed to be admitted first.

Terry paid out of her pocket. Four thousand shillings for tests and consultation, and medication. Four thousand shillings meant for restocking her clothes inventory. Four thousand shillings meant to cover her daughter’s needs for a month. The baby recovered, thank God, but Terry’s business was set back a few months. She’s still trying to recover what that emergency depleted.

This is what they meant by “widening the tax base”: finding new people to extract from, new populations to monetize, all while providing none of the services that taxation is meant to fund. It’s taxation without representation, without infrastructure, without healthcare, without education – taxation as pure extraction, as punishment for the crime of trying to survive.

And what does the government offer in return? Hustler Funds, the NYOTA programme – the former, small loans with high interest rates, the latter, a mentorship and grant programme supported by the World Bank. Terry was a beneficiary of the hustler fund at its inception. However, the rising cost of living – driven by the removal of maize flour subsidies and the spike in fuel prices – meant her business margins had evaporated. The loan, rather than providing capital for growth, became another debt obligation. This is the 21st-century version of the “golden handshake” they gave civil servants in 1993 when they retrenched them en masse under similar IMF pressure.

What haunts me the most are the students I encountered at my alma mater, pursuing the same degree I completed a year ago. Under the old HELB system, the state aimed to cover 80 per cent of the cost of each degree programme, hence in my case, as a government-sponsored student, tuition fees capped at KSh16,000 a semester, totalling at about KSh22,000, inclusive of other statutory fees. I could fund my education well enough with a loan of KSh19,500: KSh4000 for tuition, KSh15,500 for upkeep. With a plethora of part-time jobs supplementing me, I managed. Under the new model, universities charge the full market rate for degree programmes. Now, for a Bachelor of Science in Telecommunications and IT, the annual fee is set at KSh245,950. The Universities Fund (UF) provides scholarships while HELB provides loans. The allocation is determined by the Means Testing Instrument (MTI), a tool designed to categorize students into five “bands” based on their level of need. While the model is presented as a progressive reform, students placed in the most vulnerable category are now required to make a 5 per cent household contribution towards tuition, in addition to other levies and accommodation costs. For higher bands, the financial requirements become prohibitive for the average Kenyan families, particularly those whose children have been wrongly placed due to flaws in the MTI assessment.

One student told me he was considering dropping out to work online for a while as a freelance content writer. I didn’t have the heart to tell him that the gig economy he was fleeing towards was collapsing under the same policy regime that had made her education unaffordable. The trap was perfect: education has become inaccessible, and the informal work that might have paid for it was being taxed into oblivion.

I often think about David Ndii’s comment about the IMF: “When the IMF comes knocking, it essentially means the country is under receivership.” The metaphor is precise. In receivership, the interests of the creditors supersede those of stakeholders. This is the condition we inhabit: a country in receivership, where the IMF’s conditions take precedence over the survival of the population, where social investment is redefined as fiscal irresponsibility, where the gig economy – our last refuge – is being dismantled in the name of monetization.

But receivership is a legal status, not a natural condition. It is imposed and can be challenged. The demonstrations of 2024 were an assertion of this possibility, a refusal to accept the inevitability narrative. They were suppressed, but the questions they raised remain. Can we imagine an economy that serves the people who inhabit it rather than external creditors? Can we conceive of fiscal policy as an instrument of social welfare rather than extraction? Can we challenge the state of affairs we have accepted up to now?

These are survival questions. For those of us being fiscally retrenched – forced out of our livelihoods by policy disguised as mathematics – the answers will determine whether we have a future in this country at all.

The language of economic policy is designed to be obscure. Our task is to make visible what that language hides: the human cost of austerity, the political nature of supposedly technical decisions, the violence of policies that dismantle livelihoods. This essay is one attempt at a work of revelation. It won’t be the last.

The post On Being Fiscally Retrenched: Notes on Austerity and the Gig Economy first appeared on The Elephant.

Read the whole story
koranteng
15 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Withholding

1 Share
Withholding a smile in public
Poker face, your solemn eyes
Betraying nothing
For no one needs to know
The things we do
Together
To each other
For each other
There's no shame in those brief encounters
All too brief
The hum we make
Sighs
Taking comfort from the sweet ache
When you acknowledge me
Moments alone
When you teach me
Restraint amidst private joy
So I hold on to that feeling
So, yes, I make no demands in this affair of ours
Your secret is safe in these hands
Withhold away, the very essence
For that's alright with me


ghana art: mating rituals



Withholding, a playlist


A soundtrack for this affair (spotify version) File under: , , , , , , , ,

Writing log: January 17, 2023

Read the whole story
koranteng
18 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories